EFCC, ICPC Urge Dismissal of Keyamo’s Alleged Fraud Suit against Atiku

Two major anti-corruption agencies, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) have urged a Federal High Court, Abuja to dismiss the suit by Minister of State for Labour, Festus Keyamo, against the presidential candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.

Keyamo, who was also the spokesperson, Tinubu-Shettima Presidential Campaign Council (PCC), in the suit filed on January 20, is seeking an order of court compelling the EFCC, ICPC and the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) to probe and prosecute Abubakar following claims by one of his ex-aides, Michael Achimugu, that between 1999 and 2007 when Atiku was Vice President, he conspired with ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo to rip off the country using what he termed “Special Purpose Vehicles.”

When the matter came up yesterday, lawyers to the EFCC and ICPC, Samuel Okeleke and Mrs. O B. Odogu, in two separate preliminary objections, faulted the competence of the suit and prayed the court to dismiss it.

Okeleke argued that Keyamo did not comply with the requirement of the law in filing the suit, arguing that he ought to have first obtained the leave of the court in seeking to compel an agency of the government to act.

The lawyer contended that having failed to comply with the rules, the suit should not be accorded any attention.

Similarly, ICPC’s lawyer, Odogu, argued that Keyamo did not approach her agency properly, adding that the ICPC works discreetly.

“We do discrete investigation. He (Keyamo) gave us 72 hours ultimatum within which to investigate and prosecute the 1st defendant.

“That is not how we operate. We take our time to do discreet investigation,” she said.

Atiku’s lawyer, Mr. Benson Igbanoi, also faulted the competence of the suit and accused Keyamo of engaging in abuse of office.

Igbanoi, therefore urged the court to decline jurisdiction among other grounds, that  no cause of action was disclosed by the plaintiff.

In addition, he pointed out that Keyamo’s reply to his preliminary objection was filed outside the seven days allowed under the court’s rules.

Keyamo’s lawyer, O. C. Uju, urged the court to dismiss the objections raised by the defendants and proceeded to hear the case on the merit.

Uju, queried the competence of Atiku’s objection, arguing that it was filed when the court had not assumed jurisdiction over the case and before he could be served with the originating processes.

Justice Omotosho, after entertaining the arguments by lawyers to the parties, adjourned until June 5 for ruling in the preliminary objections.