Tribunal’s Judgment Not Final – Falana

Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Femi Falana, says the judiciary is facing an...

Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Femi Falana, says the judiciary is facing an unprecedented blackmail and intimation over the presidential election petitions, saying that the blackmail is not necessary since there is still opportunity for an appeal at the Supreme Court.

Falana, who was a guest on Channels Television’s Politics Today, on Monday, said there is no election petition that has attracted such attention in the country since colonial rule.

“We have been having election petitions since the colonial era, but none has attracted such level of blackmail and intimidation of the judiciary.

“I am worried that people give the impression that everything ends with the judgement of the Court of Appeal, the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal. Any party that loses on Wednesday still has the opportunity to appeal to the Supreme Court. So, what is the basis for the cheap blackmail that is going on?” the senior lawyer queried.

The senior advocate blamed the blackmail and intimidation on new voters whom he said have the belief that their candidate must be declared as the winner, saying that it is not what election tribunals are all about.

He said it is for the justices to look at the evidence adduced by the parties, apply the law and give a decision.

“As they say, even if the heavens will fall and the heavens won’t fall anyway, the judges must not be intimidated, they must give their decision regardless of blackmail or intimidations convinced that they can justify their judgment.

“That is what is required of them, to examine the evidence, apply the law and deliver a decision. One way or the other, some will lose, some will win; but those who lose in the case and are aggrieved will have another opportunity to approach the Supreme Court and demonstrate how the Court of Appeal has erred,” Falana maintained.

The Court of Appeal on Monday confirmed that it will deliver judgement on the presidential election petitions on Wednesday, adding that the proceedings will be open to live broadcast by interested television stations.

The Labour Party (LP), the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and the Allied Peoples Movement (APM), as well as their presidential candidates, had petitioned the tribunal seeking to nullify the election of President Bola Tinubu as the winner of the 2023 presidential election.

TLD Newsletter

Get the latest legal news, key cases, top lawyers, and expert analysis for your legal journey.

RELATED ARTICLES

Naval Officer in Face-Off with Wike Breached the Law — SAN

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria and constitutional law expert, Prof. Sebastine Hon, has faulted the

Agbakoba: How Nigeria Can Improve Naira Value, Hedge Volatility

Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Olisa Agbakoba,

Oworonshoki: Falana Counters Lagos Govt, Says Court Order Was Duly Served

The law firm of Falana & Falana Chambers has debunked the claim by the Attorney

Suspend Constitution Amendment, Seek Referendum, Olanipekun Tells N’Assembly

A former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), has urged the

Tinubu Must Lead On Social Welfare, Not Delegate To Governors — Falana

Human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Femi Falana, has called on President

You Can’t Have Security Without Functional Local Governments – Ubani

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Monday Ubani, says the problem of insecurity will continue

TLD Newsletter

Get the latest legal news, key cases, top lawyers, and expert analysis for your legal journey.

This Pop-up Is Included in the Theme
Best Choice for Creatives

Purchase Now

TLD Newsletter

Get the latest legal news, key cases, top lawyers, and expert analysis for your legal journey.