COURTROOM NEWS 22/11/2023
Court Orders Parties to Maintain Status Quo in Rivers Assembly Crisis
Justice Phoebe Ayuba of the Federal High Court, Port Harcourt, has ordered the parties in the Rivers parliament rift to maintain status quo pending the hearing of the Motion on Notice filed together with the main suit by the new Speaker of the House of Assembly and the House of Assembly.
Ruling on the motion filed in the suit, the trial judge ordered that none of the parties on record should do anything about the matter since all the parties are expected to respect the court.
In the suit, the new Speaker and the House of Assembly itself sought for, amongst others, a declaration that the former speaker and his former deputy, having been removed and suspended from the House, are not entitled to participate, disturb, interfere or obstruct with the performance of the legislative proceedings of the House and the legislative duties of the new speaker in accordance with the provisions of sections 90 to 104 of the Constitution of Nigeria.
They also sought for an order restraining the former two principal officers of the House from interfering or participating in the functions of the House of Assembly.
The Inspector General of Police and the Director of the State Security Service are also parties.
The motion on notice is now fixed November 27, 2023 for hearing.
Following some disagreement arising from the attempt by the former leadership of the House to impeach the State Governor, Mr Sim Fubara, the Rivers State House of Assembly has been facing some leadership crisis leading to the removal of the former speaker and the election of Honourable Edison Ehie as the new speaker.
Since then, the House has not sat as the proceedings was adjourned. Analysts said following this current case and the court order, the former speaker and his followers are not supposed to take laws into their hands.
Justice Ayua had earlier ordered the Rivers State House of Assembly, the Speaker of the House and the Deputy Speaker not to take any further step concerning the impeachment of the Governor of
Rivers State pending the determination of a suit filed by Amadi Coddey Madubuochi and Goya Oluka.
The Applicants had in the suit marked FHC /PH/CS/234/2023 filed by their counsel, Eric Omare prayed the court for the following reliefs, “An Order of Interim injunction restraining the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants from howsoever proceeding or carrying out any process and or issuing any directives connected with the impeachment or removal from office of the 7th and 8th Defendants, pending the hearing and final determination of the Motion on Notice filed in this suit.
“An Order of interim injunction restraining the 4th Defendant from accepting any instruction, directive or notification and/or carrying out ony duty, direction or order from the 1st, 2nd 9th and 4th Defendants in connection with any process howsoever intended to cause the removal from office of the 7th and 8th Defendants as Governor ond Deputy Governor of Rivers State pending the
hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice.
“An Order restraining the 5th, 6th and 9th Defendants from enforcing any instruction, notice or order issued by 1st, 2nd or 3rd Defendants or any officer acting on their behalf in connection with the removal of the 7th and 8th Defendants or obstructing them from acting pending the hearing ond final determination of the Motion on Notice filed in this suit.
“And for such other or further orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstances of this sult.”
After reading the Affidavit in support of the Motion sworn to by Amadi Goddey Madubuochi, and hearing E. K. Omare, for the Plaintiffs/Applicants, the court ordered as follows:
“That an Order is made directing the Plaintiffs/Applicants to put the Respondents on Notice forthwith.
“That an Order is however, made, directing that all parties on record respect the Court and should not take any step concerning the subject matter in this matter, since the matter is already before this Court-sub judice-pending the hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice.”